Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Communication Disorders Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bendet, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hammermeister, F. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Auditory, Visual, and Auditory-Visual Language Learning by Deaf Students

Roslyn M. Bendet

Pittsburgh Public Schools

Frieda K. Hammermeister

University of Pittsburgh

Fifty-two deaf students were the subjects in an investigation examining the differential effects of auditory, visual (lipreading), and auditory-visual teaching modes on the recognition of spoken and written sentences. Spoken sentences representing six syntactic structures were taught to the students through one of the three teaching modes. Subjects who were taught using the visual or auditory-visual modes made significantly fewer errors during a training program than subjects who were taught using the auditory mode. After receiving additional practice in using written sentences and pictures, all subjects achieved significantly higher post-test scores on an adapted version of the Northwestern Syntax Screening Test. Implications for teaching are discussed.

Communication Disorders Quarterly, Vol. 5, No. 2, 104-116 (1981)
DOI: 10.1177/152574018100500203


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?