Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Communication Disorders Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Coufal, K. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Computerized Screening Instrument of Language Learnability

Ellen L. Jacobs

University of Nebraska at Omaha

Kathy L. Coufal

University of Nebraska at Omaha

The demand for efficient, psychometrically sound, culturally and linguistically neutral tools for predicting which children are at risk for language learning disorders has increased over the last decade. Traditional screening instruments have had questionable validity for diverse populations, and culturally and linguistically sensitive, nontraditional assessment procedures typically have not been considered efficient for screening purposes. This article presents further analyses of a pilot study that examined the effectiveness of a computerized language screening instrument for multicultural children. Results suggest that because of its computerization and language learnability features, this innovative instrument may be an effective alternative to currently available screening procedures.

Communication Disorders Quarterly, Vol. 22, No. 2, 67-75 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/152574010102200202
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Learn DisabilHome page
E. L. Grigorenko
Dynamic Assessment and Response to Intervention: Two Sides of One Coin
J Learn Disabil, March 1, 2009; 42(2): 111 - 132.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication Disorders QuarterlyHome page
C. Roseberry-McKibbin and L. O'Hanlon
Nonbiased Assessment of English Language Learners: A Tutorial
Communication Disorders Quarterly, January 1, 2005; 26(3): 178 - 185.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication Disorders QuarterlyHome page
E. L. Jacobs
The Effects of Adding Dynamic Assessment Components to a Computerized Preschool Language Screening Test
Communication Disorders Quarterly, January 1, 2001; 22(4): 217 - 226.
[Abstract] [PDF]