Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Communication Disorders Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Norris, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Maybe the Problem Isn't Whole Language

Janet Norris, Ph.D.

Louisiana State University, ADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE TO: Dr. Janet Norris Dept. COMD 163 M & DA Bldg LSU Baton Rouge, LA 70803–2606

Whole Language has come under recent attack, especially as some programs implementing instruction considered "whole language" have seen decreases in achievement scores in reading and writing (Fry, 1995). This has led many educators and parents to question whole language as a teaching philosophy and to mandate the structured, systematic teaching of phonics and other skill-based methods. However, many problems that are attributed to whole language as a philosophy are the outcomes of other educational dynamics that have led to ineffective practices. Issues related to identification of methodologies as "whole language," failure to provide adequate training or mentoring to teachers, confusion of language as a communication process with language arts skills, the professional reluctance to provide teachers with a scaffold as an entry level into whole language, and failure to apply known principles of intervention within a whole language framework for children with special needs have all clouded the question regarding the efficacy of whole language philosophy and practice. Examination of these issues may clarify some of the present controversy, and provide considerations for program evaluation and change.

Communication Disorders Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 2, 67-71 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/152574019501700207
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?